Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Waleed Elaghil's avatar

"Small quick wins" is definitely the best approach but come disguised with a deadly mindset trap I've seen many leaders carry in my experience.

The most challenging thing with quick wins is uncovering which has the most "lever". A task that requires analytical thinking, data, tooling and a solid strategy with metric trees to unvover... all are rarely defined in big companies let alone startups.

Quick wins for me has always been a great story to preach but incredibly hard to execute

On a side note, I 💯 agree with you that in the event of not having the right foundation or time to uncover those gems... then your best bet is to throw as many arrows and see which one hits the bullseye (which is all about action and velocity). It may take a quarter or two or it may take 4 years. It's solely based on initial gut feeling and feedback loops that improves with time.

Mahmood Malik's avatar

Salaam Moayyed, thanks for sharing this.

How do you personally define quick wins?

Are they small, measurable outcomes that prove a system is working, or are they more about emotional momentum, getting people to believe faster? I’ve found that some “quick wins” create real compounding leverage, while others just create temporary enthusiasm. I’m curious how you separate the two in practice.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?